John Kirkpatrick's opinion piece published on Sunday leaves no doubt the Patriot's editorial board and Linda D. Thompson have found common ground. Both are clueless.
The Patriot-News continues to believe if only Linda "would reach out to others in this time of crisis, helping those of us in the press to communicate (her) ideas and plans for the city" everything will be just fine. Trouble is, Linda doesn't have a plan or any ideas or a Communications Director/Translator to prevent her from taunting angry citizens.
Incredibly, Kirkpatrick writes:
Candidate Thompson was different than Mayor Thompson. She was continually out and about in the city sharing her vision. She expressed strong opinions but also surrounded herself with smart and dedicated people, including local business leaders. She offered hope and excitement to many city residents who felt cut out from the city’s successes. Our editorials at the time expressed reservations about her personal style but also reflected and honored the faith that people from different races, parts of the city and walks of life had placed in her.
Really? To express surprise that a candidate is not delivering on promises strikes us as supremely naive. We also had quite a different take on the editorials at the time.
If John really wants to honest, perhaps he will address rumors that days before the election a coalition of black clergy met with the editorial board and demanded the paper back off coverage of Thompson. The Patriot caved and imposed a moratorium on any reportage of the Harrisburg mayoral contest as election day approached.
Kirkpatrick slogs on in the Patriot's defense, "In our editorial columns, we have continually pleaded with Mayor Thompson for the transparency she promised on the campaign trail."
John, what ever made you think Linda Thompson who has veiled parts of her past in secrecy had any intention of being open and transparent? While on the campaign trail promising transparency she threw one of your reporters out of a press conference. Pleading for transparency now seems a bit beside the point.
In case we haven't been paying attention, Kirkpatrick catalogs examples of Thompson's questionable and erratic behavior in his piece including her belief the Patriot has bugged her office and the "forces of evil" voicemail she left on a citizen's cellphone.
We get it John. No one who hasn't drunk Linda's Kool-Aid thinks the Patriot is "out to get" her. In fact, many who have been paying attention think the Patriot has shirked its journalistic mandate.
The sooner the editorial board realizes there are some truisms in life, the better for all of us.
- You can't appease a tyrant.
- You can't negotiate with terrorists.
- You can't reason with the insane.
Ever optimistic, we cling to the hope the Patriot ran this Neville Chamberlainesque codswallop as yet another trial balloon. Sadly for the Patriot, the Central Penn Business Journal's courageous editorial published the previous Friday was already garnering praise on PennLive from commentators who urged the venerable daily to "grow a pair."
The Patriot insists it cares about " . . . Harrisburg’s future. This has been our home for more than 150 years and will continue to be our home."
For 150 years, from President Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address to . . . terrorism on the home front, The Patriot-News has reported and recorded the joy and despair of life's individual moments and humanity's collective experience.
-- From The Patriot-News "Our History" webpage
One thing is certain. The Patriot is still getting it as spectacularly wrong today as it did then. Here's what it printed after Lincoln's speech at Gettysburg:
". . . we pass over the silly remarks of the President: for the credit of the nation we are willing that the veil of oblivion shall be dropped over them and that they shall no more be repeated or thought of."